Sponsors
Darrell Issa (R) CA
Cosponsors
Laurel Lee (R) FL, Troy Nehls (R) TX, Kevin Kiley (R) CA
Summary
This bill does not yet have a summary.
Subjects
Arizona, California, Colorado, Congressional oversight, Delaware, Federal district courts, Florida, Georgia, Government information and archives, Government studies and investigations, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Judges, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York State, Oklahoma, TexasPolicy Areas
LawNext Steps
The bill has been referred to the House Judiciary Committee. The next steps include committee hearings, potential markup sessions, and a vote by the full House of Representatives.Social Impact
The bill aims to improve access to justice by reducing case backlogs and wait times in overloaded federal courts, benefiting citizens in need of legal recourse. However, it could also exacerbate existing disparities in court access if the additional judges are not equitably distributed.Business Impact
The bill may cause increased legal costs for businesses involved in litigation in the affected districts due to increased caseloads, but could also benefit businesses by facilitating faster resolution of commercial disputes.Financial Impact
The bill authorizes significant appropriations to fund the additional judgeships and related court costs. This increases federal spending but may result in long-term cost savings by reducing case backlogs and associated delays.Bill History
Thursday, February 27, 2025
IntroReferral - Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Thursday, February 27, 2025
IntroReferral - Introduced in House
Thursday, February 27, 2025
IntroReferral - Introduced in House
Bill Text
Introduced in House February 27, 2025
Formatted Text PDF Formatted XML